Spearman

(HC) Vasquez v. Spearman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 3, 20212:18-cv-00073California516 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ISAAC VASQUEZ, No. 2:18-cv-00073-TLN-KJN Petitioner, v. ORDER M. ELIOT SPEARMAN, Respondent. 16 Petitioner Isaac Vasquez (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 24, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations recommending that Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied. (ECF No. 15.) The findings and recommendations contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (Id.) Neither party filed objections to the findings and recommendations. On October 7, 2020, the Court adopted the April 24, 2020 findings and recommendations and judgment was entered. (ECF Nos. 18–19.) /// 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.