United States v. Richardson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 5, 20211:19-cv-00275California464 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 1:19-cv-0275-NONE-JLT Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS GRANTING

DONALD R. RICHARDSON, et al., PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT

JUDGMENT

Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 45, 46) 16 17 By way of a complaint filed February 29, 2019, the United States seeks to enforce a federal judgment lien and federal tax liens against real property located at 32712 Harmony Drive, in Bakersfield, California (“Property”), owned by judgment debtor Donald R. Richardson. (See Doc. Nos. 1, 45.) Richardson was served with the summons and complaint (Doc. No. 32), but failed to respond thereto. The Clerk of Court entered default against Richardson on November 13, 2020. (Doc. No. 37.) The United States moved for default judgment against Richardson on March 19, 2021. (Doc. No. 45.) Pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(19), the motion was referred to the assigned magistrate judge. On April 13, 2021, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.