Baccera

(PC) Pradia, Jr. v. Baccera

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 7, 20211:20-cv-01348California2,809 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARL LAPRA PRADIA, JR., Case No. 1:20-cv-01348-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

v. OR NOTIFY THE COURT OF HIS

DESIRE TO PROCEED ONLY ON

A. BECERRA, et al., CLAIMS FOUND COGNIZABLE

Defendants. (Doc. 1)

21-DAY DEADLINE

Carl Lapra Pradia, Jr., alleges the defendants used excessive force against him and provided him inadequate medical attention. (Doc. 1.) The Court finds that Plaintiff’s complaint states cognizable claims of deliberate indifference to serious medical needs against Defendants Becerra and Davis, but its remaining claims are not cognizable. Accordingly, the Court directs Plaintiff to file a first amended complaint curing the deficiencies identified in this order or a notice that he wishes to proceed only on the claims found cognizable. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is required to screen complaints brought…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.