(PC) Johnson v. Solano County Public Defenders Office

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 3, 20212:21-cv-00258California3,025 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 TERRELL JOHNSON, No. 2:21-cv-0258 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SOLANO COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER’S OFFICE, et al., 14 Defendants.

16 Plaintiff, a county inmate proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims his right were violated because the Solano County Public Defender’s Office and Conflict Defender’s Office refused to represent him. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 5) and his complaint for screening (ECF No. 1). For the reasons set forth below, the court will deny the motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the complaint with leave to amend. IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 5.) However, shortly thereafter plaintiff paid the filing fee in full. Because plaintiff has paid the filing fee, the court will deny the motion to proceed in forma…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.