Majano

(PS) Yerike v. Majano

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 10, 20212:20-cv-02555California1,739 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEBRA YERIKE, No. 2:20-cv-2555 KJM DB PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS VALERIE MAJANO, et al., Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Debra Yerike is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was, therefore, referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the undersigned is a motion to substitute in as the sole defendant and to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure filed by the United States. (ECF No. 3.) For the reasons stated below, the undersigned recommends that the motion be granted and plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed without leave to amend. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, commenced this action on March 3, 2020, by filing a complaint in the Yolo County Superior Court. (ECF No. 1-1.) Therein, plaintiff alleges that Dr. Valerie Majano, DDS, and Dr. Dennis Su, DMD,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.