Munoz

(PC) Harris v. Munoz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 10, 20212:16-cv-00830California4,191 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GRADY HARRIS, No. 2:16-cv-0830 TLN DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

JEFF MACOMBER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges defendants violated his Eighth and First Amendment rights. In this order the court will address several issues associated with this action and screen the second amended complaint. BACKGROUND This action has been proceeding on plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (FAC) against defendant correctional officers Rose, Munoz, Fong, Williamson, Calderon, Thompson, Cervantes, Fuller, and Leavitt. Defendants Rose, Munoz, Fong, Williamson, Calderon, Thompson, Cervantes, and Fuller are represented by the Office of the Attorney General and defendant Leavitt is represented by private counsel. By…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.