(PS) Tapia v. The Boeing Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 11, 20212:20-cv-02218California415 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICARDO TAPIA, No. 2:20-cv-02218-TLN-CKD (PS) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THE BOEING COMPANY, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff proceeds pro se in this action, which was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(3). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In his complaint filed on November 5, 2020, plaintiff alleges he was discriminated and retaliated against by his former employer, defendant The Boeing Company, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. (ECF No. 1.) Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), defendant moved to dismiss all claims for failure to state a claim, among other requested relief. (ECF No. 5.) By order dated March 12, 2021, the undersigned granted defendant’s motion to dismiss, with leave to amend, for failure to state a claim. (ECF No. 18.) Plaintiff was granted thirty days to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff was warned that failure to file an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.