Trujillo
Trujillo v. Harsarb Inc
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JOSE TRUJILLO, Case No. 1:21-cv-00342-NONE-SAB
Plaintiff, ORDER CONTINUING MANDATORY
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND
v. REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE A
MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
HARSARB INC., et al.,
SIXTY DAY DEADLINE
Defendants.
16 Jose Trujillo (“Plaintiff”) filed this action on March 5, 2021, against Harsarb Inc. and Harsarb Firm LLC (“Defendants”). On May 14, 2021, Plaintiff filed a request for entry of default and the Clerk of the Court entered default against Defendants. (ECF Nos. 8, 9, 10.) Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 55, obtaining a default judgment is a two- step process. Yue v. Storage Technology Corp., No. 3:07-cv-05850, 2008 WL 361142, *2 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2008). Entry of default is appropriate as to any party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought that has failed to plead or otherwise defend as provided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and where that fact is made to appear by affidavit or…