Trujillo

Trujillo v. Harsarb Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 17, 20211:21-cv-00342California413 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE TRUJILLO, Case No. 1:21-cv-00342-NONE-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER CONTINUING MANDATORY

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND

v. REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE A

MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

HARSARB INC., et al.,

SIXTY DAY DEADLINE

Defendants.

16 Jose Trujillo (“Plaintiff”) filed this action on March 5, 2021, against Harsarb Inc. and Harsarb Firm LLC (“Defendants”). On May 14, 2021, Plaintiff filed a request for entry of default and the Clerk of the Court entered default against Defendants. (ECF Nos. 8, 9, 10.) Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 55, obtaining a default judgment is a two- step process. Yue v. Storage Technology Corp., No. 3:07-cv-05850, 2008 WL 361142, *2 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2008). Entry of default is appropriate as to any party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought that has failed to plead or otherwise defend as provided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and where that fact is made to appear by affidavit or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.