Diaz
(PC) Sandoval v. Diaz
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JULIO SANDOVAL, No. 1:20-cv-01374-NONE-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE
v. DISMISSED RALPH M. DIAZ, et al., (ECF No. 25) Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
TWENTY-ONE DAYS
16 Plaintiff Julio Sandoval (“Plaintiff”) is a state inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on September 28, 2020. (ECF No. 1.) On November 19, 2020, the Court screened the complaint and found it failed to state any claims 20 because it violated Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8. (ECF No. 14.) The Court gave Plaintiff 21 thirty days to either file an amended complaint or notify the Court in writing that he wants to 22 stand on his complaint. (Id. at 10.) 23 On February 16, 2021, Plaintiff filed his First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). (ECF No. 24 17.) On March 1, 2021, the…