Beck

(PS) De Volksbank N.V. v. Beck

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 13, 20212:19-cv-00043California366 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DE VOLKSBANK N.V. fka SNS REGIO No. 2:19-cv-0043 MCE DB PS

BANK N.V.,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER v. NICHOLAS GEORGE BECK, an individual, and ANGELIQUE VERSCHUUR, an individual, Defendants. 18 Defendants Nicholas George Beck and Angelique Verschuur are proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On April 6, 2021, the assigned District Judge ordered the defendants “to file a formal answer to the complaint within 28 days[.]” (ECF No. 31 at 2.) On May 5, 2021, defendants filed a document purporting to “formally answer” the order of the assigned District Judge and stating, in general, that defendants “agree with the” April 6, 2021 order. (ECF No. 32 at 1.) Defendants are advised that “[a]n answer should contain whatever denials and defenses are necessary to refute the material allegations of the complaint. Its function is to put the case ‘at 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.