CDCR

(PC) Christian v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 5, 20212:21-cv-00305California499 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EARL DEAN CHRISTIAN, No. 2:21-cv-0305 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. Plaintiff filed a motion for a ninety-day extension of time to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff asserts that in order to comply with the court’s order, he will need to request from the CDCR “a plethora of documentation” as to what transpired on May 25, 2018, including videos, what officers checked out 40 mm launchers, and memos activating the integration of general population inmates with sensitive needs inmates. Plaintiff requests numerous subpoena duces tecum to obtain such “voluminous documentation.” (ECF No. 21 at 2.) Plaintiff is advised that this action cannot proceed until he has an operative complaint on file. Plaintiff is not required to submit evidence with his complaint. However, by signing an amended complaint, plaintiff certifies he has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.