(PS) Garcia v. City of Sacramento, CA, al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL CARLOS GARCIA, No. 2:21–cv–36–KJM-KJN PS Plaintiff, ORDER v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 In January 2021, plaintiff, who is proceeding without counsel, filed his claims against defendants, paid the filing fee, and executed service. On April 19, defendants filed a motion to dismiss, noticing the motion for a May 20, 2021 hearing before the undersigned. (ECF No. 9.) Under the Court’s Local Rules, plaintiff was obligated to file and serve written opposition (or statement of non-opposition) to defendants’ motion at least fourteen days prior to the hearing date: or May 6, 2021. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(c) (“Opposition, if any, to the granting of the motion shall be in writing and shall be filed and served not less than fourteen (14) days preceding the [] hearing date.”). A review of the court’s docket reveals plaintiff failed to do either by the deadline. /// 27 This action proceeds before the undersigned pursuant to 28…