Richer
(PC) Roberts v. Richer
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 13, 20211:21-cv-00714California2,172 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID NATHANIEL ROBERTS, Case No. 1:21-cv-714-AWI-HBK Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
VACATE PRIOR ORDER GRANTING
FNU RICHER; FNU PRECIADO; FNU PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO PROCEED
CALVINO, IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND TO DISMISS CASE
WITHOUT PREJUDICE1 Defendants. OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS
(Doc. No. 4)
18 19 20 21 Plaintiff David Nathaniel Roberts, a state prisoner, is proceeding pro se on his civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the Sacramento Division of this court. (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiff accompanied the filing of his complaint with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Doc. No. 2). The Sacramento Division of this court granted plaintiff’s motion for leave
1 This matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302 (E.D. Cal. 2019). 28 1…