Richer

(PC) Roberts v. Richer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 13, 20211:21-cv-00714California2,172 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID NATHANIEL ROBERTS, Case No. 1:21-cv-714-AWI-HBK Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

VACATE PRIOR ORDER GRANTING

FNU RICHER; FNU PRECIADO; FNU PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO PROCEED

CALVINO, IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND TO DISMISS CASE

WITHOUT PREJUDICE1 Defendants. OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS

(Doc. No. 4)

18 19 20 21 Plaintiff David Nathaniel Roberts, a state prisoner, is proceeding pro se on his civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the Sacramento Division of this court. (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiff accompanied the filing of his complaint with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Doc. No. 2). The Sacramento Division of this court granted plaintiff’s motion for leave

1 This matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302 (E.D. Cal. 2019). 28 1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.