Avalos

Avalos v. Sidhu

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 17, 20211:20-cv-01602California5,918 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GEORGE AVALOS, Case No. 1:20-cv-01602-NONE-SKO 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR v. DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT KAMLJIT BRAR BE

GRANTED IN PART

BALJIT SINGH SIDHU, NAVJEET SINGH CAHAL, and KAMALJIT BRAR, (Doc. 21) 15 Defendants. OBJECTIONS DUE: 21 DAYS 16 _________________________________ / 17 I. INTRODUCTION On February 17, 2021, Plaintiff George Avalos (“Plaintiff”) filed a motion for default judgment against Defendant Kamaljit Brar. (Doc. 21.) No opposition to Plaintiff’s motion was filed. The Court reviewed the motion and supporting documentation and found the matter suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). The hearing set for March 24, 2021, was therefore vacated. (Doc. 22.) This proceeding was referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.