Robinson

Robinson v. Clear Recon Corp

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 30, 20212:20-cv-01874California927 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JANET ROBINSON, No. 2:20–cv–1874–KJM–CKD PS Plaintiff, ORDER v. (ECF No. 19) CLEAR RECON CORP; WELLS FARGO

15 Defendants.

17 On December 10, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 19), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. On December 28, 2020, plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations (ECF No. 20), and on January 4, 2021, plaintiff filed “amended” objections (ECF No. 22)—both of which have been considered by the court. The court has also considered Wells Fargo’s response to these objections. ECF No. 23. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.