Fisher
(HC) Pilman v. Fisher
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GERALD PILMAN, No. 2:20-CV-1771-WBS-DMC-P Petitioner, v. ORDER R. FISHER, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules. On March 12, 2021, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within the time specified therein. The court construes Petitioner’s untimely opposition to Respondent’s motion to dismiss, filed on March 29, 2021, as Petitioner’s objections to the March 12, 2021, findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed…