Sly V. Batten v. Fresno Superior Court

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 3, 20211:21-cv-00693California3,007 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SLY VAN BATTEN, No. 1:21-cv-00693-NONE-EPG (PS) Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S

FRESNO SUPERIOR COURT, et al., COMPLAINT BE DISMISSED FOR

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, WITHOUT

Defendants. LEAVE TO AMEND (ECF NO. 1) TWENTY-ONE-DAY DEADLINE 18 Plaintiff Sly Van Batten (“Plaintiff”) is a state inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on April 26, 2021. (ECF No. 1). The complaint brings claims for money damages in relation to his sentence. The Court finds that the complaint fails to state any cognizable claims. The Court further finds that Plaintiff’s complaint cannot be cured by amendment and therefore recommends dismissing the complaint without leave to amend. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.