(PS) Parlante v. American River College

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 3, 20212:20-cv-02268California998 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN PARLANTE, Case No. 2:20-cv-02268-TLN-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER v. ECF No. 1 AMERICAN RIVER COLLEGE and FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT DUE

JOHN DOE, WITHIN 30 DAYS

15 Defendants. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

ECF No. 2 18 Plaintiff moves to proceed without prepayment of filing fees, ECF No. 2. Plaintiff’s affidavit satisfies the requirements to proceed without prepayment of fees. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Thus, the motion, ECF No. 2, is granted. Having granted plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, this complaint is now subject to screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Plaintiff alleges that on November 7, 2018, he was assaulted from behind by the John Doe defendant while he was in a library study room at American River College. ECF No. 1 at 2. Plaintiff states, vaguely, that he…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.