Barber

(PC) Wilkins v. Barber

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 7, 20212:19-cv-01338California1,429 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEENAN WILKINS, aka NERRAH No. 2:19-cv-1338 WBS KJN P

BROWN,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER AND REVISED SCHEDULING v. ORDER 14 DR. CHRISTINE S. BARBER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claims concerning medical care, and a related retaliation claim against defendant Barber. Plaintiff sought clarification of this court’s January 14, 2021 order modifying the scheduling order and now seeks further extension of time to complete discovery. As discussed below, plaintiff’s motion for clarification is partially granted, and his motion to extend the discovery deadline is granted. Operative Scheduling Order On September 29, 2020, the undersigned issued a discovery and scheduling order; the deadline for discovery was set for January 22, 2021, and required that all requests for discovery pursuant to Federal Rules of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.