Pfeiffer

(PC) Grigsby v. Pfeiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 17, 20211:17-cv-01384California2,617 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 JONATHAN GRIGSBY, Case No. 1:17-cv-01384-DAD-JLT (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO GRANT DEFENDANT’S MOTION v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (EXHAUSTION)

M. HERNANDEZ,

(Docs. 62, 65) Defendant. 14-DAY DEADLINE The defendant filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (Exhaustion) (Doc. 61). Though the plaintiff has opposed the motion, the facts regarding exhaustion are not in dispute. Because the defendant has demonstrated the plaintiff failed to exhaust the administrative remedies, the Court RECOMMENDS the motion for summary judgment be GRANTED. I. LEGAL STANDARDS A. Summary Judgment Summary judgment is appropriate when the moving party “shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a). The moving party bears the initial burden of proving the absence of a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.