Smith v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 18, 20212:19-cv-01426California1,661 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLIFFORD SMITH, KRISTINA No. 2:19–cv–01426–TLN–CKD

FLESHMAN,

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON Plaintiffs, MOTION FOR TERMINATING SANCTIONS 13 (ECF No. 25) TO JUNE 2, 2021 & v.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Defendant City of Sacramento (hereinafter “City”) has filed a motion for terminating sanctions, or in the alternative, monetary sanctions. (ECF No. 25.) The motion was noticed for a hearing on May 26, 2021, causing plaintiffs’ opposition to be due no later than May 12, 2021.1 See E.D. Cal. R. 230(c). Plaintiffs have not opposed the motion. As set forth below, plaintiffs are ordered to show cause, in writing, why the court should not grant the motion for terminating sanctions. In addition, the hearing on the City’s motion for terminating sanctions is continued to June 2, 2021 at 10:00 a.m., to be heard at the same time as the motion for sanctions filed by defendant Angela Vickers, M.D. (ECF No. 28.)

1 This matter is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.