(PC) Stanfield v. CA Correctional Health Care Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 6, 20211:20-cv-01145California3,883 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICAH C. STANFIELD, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-01145-NONE-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION v. ) RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION

CA. CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE ) (ECF No. 21) ) SERVICES, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) )

Plaintiff Micah C. Stanfield is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff filed the initial complaint in this action on August 5, 2020. (ECF No. 1.) On September 18, 2020, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint. (ECF No. 10.) On October 7, 2020, the Court screened Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, found no cognizable claims, and granted Plaintiff thirty days to file a second amended complaint. (ECF No. 13.) Plaintiff filed a second…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.