(PS) Madariaga v. Freedom Mortgage & Trustee Corps

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 28, 20212:20-cv-02141California365 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SEILA MADARIAGA and CHRISTINA No. 2:20-cv-02141-TLN-AC

MADARIAGA,

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v.

FREEDOM MORTGAGE & TRUSTEE

CORPS, Defendant. 17 Plaintiffs Seila Madariaga and Christina Madariaga (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) are proceeding in this action pro se. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On January 13, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiffs and which contained notice to that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 14.) Plaintiffs have not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. Although it appears from the file that Plaintiffs’ copy of the findings and recommendations was returned, Plaintiffs were properly served. It is Plaintiffs’ responsibility to keep the Court apprised of their current addresses at all times. Pursuant to Local…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.