Unknown

(PC) Acevedo v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 4, 20212:21-cv-00524California321 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARMANDO ZEPEDA ACEVEDO, No. 2:21-cv-0524 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

UNKNOWN, Defendant. 16 By order filed March 25, 2021, plaintiff was informed that his letter was insufficient to commence an action. He was granted thirty days leave to file a complaint along with an application to proceed in forma pauperis or the court’s filing fee. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to comply with the order would result in a recommendation that this matter be dismissed. Thirty days from the order have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed a complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and IT IS RECOMMENDED that this matter be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.