Dikran

(PC) McRae v. Dikran

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 17, 20211:16-cv-01066California1,477 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL SCOTT McRAE, 1:16-01066-NONE-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO COMPEL

v.

ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR

BAIRAMIAN DIKRAN, et al., ISSUANCE OF SUBPOENAS, WITHOUT

PREJUDICE

Defendants. (ECF No. 100.)

20 I. BACKGROUND Michael Scott McRae (“Plaintiff”) is a former federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens vs. Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint filed on March 9, 2018, against defendants Dr. Dikran Bairamian,1 Dr. Kevin Cuong Nguyen, and Dr.

27 1 In his original Complaint, Plaintiff referred to this defendant as Dr. Bairamian, Dikran, M.D. (ECF No. 1.) The court entered the defendant’s name as Bairamian Dikran. (Court docket.) In his Answer to the complaint, defense counsel clarifies that this defendant’s name is Dikran Bairamian. (ECF No. 32.) David Betts…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.