(PS) Williams v. McDonald's Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 18, 20212:20-cv-01214California697 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KIRK D. WILLIAMS, No. 2:20-cv-1214 TLN DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER MCDONALD’S CORPORATION, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Kirk Williams is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On April 6, 2021, defendant noticed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint. (ECF No. 12.) On April 15, 2021, plaintiff filed a motion for an extension of time to file an opposition to defendant’s motion to dismiss and to prepare a motion for leave to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 13.) On April 26, 2021, the undersigned issued an order continuing the hearing of defendant’s motion to dismiss to August 6, 2021, and granting plaintiff until June 4, 2021 to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 14.) On April 26, 2021, plaintiff filed a motion seeking “ADA accommodation,” and noticed the motion for hearing before the undersigned on May…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.