CDCR

(PC) Gomez v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 18, 20212:20-cv-00198California2,752 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALFREDO GOMEZ, No. 2:20-cv-0198 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION, et al., Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and has requested authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF Nos. 1, 2. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). For the reasons stated below, plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. In addition, the undersigned will recommend that this action be dismissed without leave to amend for lack of jurisdiction. //// //// 28 I. IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See ECF No. 2. Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.