Camacho

(PC) Bishop v. Camacho

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 3, 20212:20-cv-01762California294 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 TOR AHMADD BISHOP, Case No. 2:20-cv-01762-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR DISCOVERY

v. ECF No. 32 P. CAMACHO,

Defendant. 15 Plaintiff has filed a letter in which he asks that defendant produce documents related to an administrative appeal. ECF No. 32 at 2. He also asks the court to order him to undergo a polygraph examination to assist him in proving his allegations. Id. at 6. Discovery requests shall be filed with the court only if they require the court’s involvement. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 250.2-250.4. Currently, there is no court proceeding that necessitates review of plaintiff’s discovery requests. To the extent that plaintiff intended to serve defendant with his discovery requests by filing them with the court, that approach is improper. Plaintiff must instead serve his discovery requests on defendant. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 30-36. Separately, the court is not authorized to order the requested polygraph test. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.