Huerta

(PC) Cruz v. Huerta

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 10, 20211:20-cv-01073California475 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GUILLERMO TRUJILLO CRUZ, No. 1:20-cv-01073-DAD-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

RESPONSE AS MOOT AND DISMISSING

HUERTA, et al., ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 15, 16) 16 17 Plaintiff Guillermo Trujillo Cruz is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 28, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and that plaintiff be required to pay the filing fee in full to proceed with this action. (Doc. No. 6.) Following the granting of an extension of time to do so, plaintiff filed his objections on September 21, 2020. (Doc. No. 13.) On March 12, 2021, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.