Adams

Adams v. City of Redding

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 18, 20212:20-cv-01610California2,301 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CINDY ADAMS, individually and as No. 2:20-cv-01610-TLN-DMC Personal Representative to the Estate of

JESSE ADAMS,

13 Plaintiff, ORDER 14 v.

CITY OF REDDING; KYLE CORRIGAN,

CHRISTOPHER STAUP, EDWARD MCGINNIS, and DOES 4 through 10, 17 Defendants. 18 19 This matter is before the Court on Defendant City of Redding’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 22.) Plaintiff Cindy Adams (“Plaintiff”) opposed Defendant’s motion. (ECF No. 23.) Defendant filed a Reply. (ECF No. 24.) For the reasons stated herein, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 22.) /// /// /// 27 Plaintiff alleges claims against multiple Defendants, but City of Redding is the only Defendant bringing the instant Motion to Dismiss. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff’s claims arise from the death of Jesse Adams (“Decedent”). On December 22, 2019, Decedent was stopped by police while traveling through the City of Redding. (ECF No. 15 at 4.) During the traffic stop,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.