(PC) Gann v. Valley State Prison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 3, 20211:19-cv-01797California1,014 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NATHANIEL MARCUS GANN, 1:19-cv-01797-DAD-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION

vs. PROCEED ONLY AGAINST DEFENDANTS

FISHER, PAEZ, ANGUIANO, CHAPAS, LUCERO,

VALLEY STATE PRISON, et al., MARQUEZ, CRUZ, AND MOOSEBAUR FOR

VIOLATION OF RLUIPA, VIOLATION OF THE

Defendants. FIRST AMENDMENT FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE,

AND ADVERSE CONDITIONS OF CONFINEMENT

IN VIOLATION OF THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT;

AGAINST DEFENDANTS FISHER AND

MOOSEBAUR FOR FAILURE TO PROTECT

PLAINTIFF IN VIOLATION OF THE EIGHTH

AMENDMENT; AND AGAINST DEFENDANT

MOOSEBAUR FOR RETALIATION IN

VIOLATION OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT; AND

THAT ALL OTHER CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

BE DISMISSED

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN 14 DAYS

22 Plaintiff Nathaniel Marcus Gann is a state prisoner proceeding…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.