(PC) Gann v. Valley State Prison
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 3, 20211:19-cv-01797California1,014 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
NATHANIEL MARCUS GANN, 1:19-cv-01797-DAD-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION
vs. PROCEED ONLY AGAINST DEFENDANTS
FISHER, PAEZ, ANGUIANO, CHAPAS, LUCERO,
VALLEY STATE PRISON, et al., MARQUEZ, CRUZ, AND MOOSEBAUR FOR
VIOLATION OF RLUIPA, VIOLATION OF THE
Defendants. FIRST AMENDMENT FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE,
AND ADVERSE CONDITIONS OF CONFINEMENT
IN VIOLATION OF THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT;
AGAINST DEFENDANTS FISHER AND
MOOSEBAUR FOR FAILURE TO PROTECT
PLAINTIFF IN VIOLATION OF THE EIGHTH
AMENDMENT; AND AGAINST DEFENDANT
MOOSEBAUR FOR RETALIATION IN
VIOLATION OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT; AND
THAT ALL OTHER CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS
BE DISMISSED
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN 14 DAYS
22 Plaintiff Nathaniel Marcus Gann is a state prisoner proceeding…