Bonilla

Bonilla v. California Highway Patrol

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 14, 20212:16-cv-01742California553 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNTED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 GUILLERMO BONILLA, SANDRA ) 2:16-cv-01742 LEK AMAYA BONILLA, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL AN ) AGENEY OF THE STATE OF ) CALIFORNIA; OFFER MCKENZIE ) AND SGT. PETERSON and DOES ) TO 50, ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________) 20 21 ORDER TERMINATING PARTIES On April 22, 2021, the following orders were entered: the Order Granting Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (“Summary Judgment Order”); and the Order Granting Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Defendant Peterson for Failure to Serve (“Dismissal Order”). [Dkt. nos. 93, 94.1] This Court granted summary judgment in favor of Defendants California Highway Patrol (“Highway Patrol”) and Muriel McKenzie…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.