Villamizar

Villamizar v. Senior Care Pharmacy Services, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 28, 20212:14-cv-01737California2,256 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL VILLAMIZAR, No. 2:14-cv-01737-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER SENIOR CARE PHARMACY SERVICES,

INC., SAMITENDU BANERJEE, ARA

KEUSGARIAN, and TONY NGUYEN,

16 Defendants. 17 18 This matter is before the Court on Defendants Senior Care Pharmacy Services, Inc. (“Senior Care”), Samitendu Banerjee (“Banerjee”), Ara Keusgarian (“Keusgarian”), and Tony Nguyen’s (“Nguyen”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 77.) Plaintiff Paul Villamizar (“Plaintiff”) opposed the motion. (ECF No. 78.) Defendants replied. (ECF No. 80.) For the reasons discussed herein, the Court DENIES Defendants’ Motion. (ECF No. 77.) /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On July 23, 2014, Plaintiff filed a Complaint under seal against Senior Care and Banerjee (the sole owner of Senior Care) for qui tam causes of action under the Federal False Claims Act and the California False Claims Act. (ECF No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.