Arnette

(PC) Jones v. Arnette

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 24, 20211:16-cv-01212California3,113 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEREMY JONES, 1:16-cv-01212-DAD-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO COMPEL IN PART

vs. (ECF No. 75.)

ARNETTE, et al., ORDER FOR DEFENDANTS TO PROVIDE

FURTHER RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF’S

Defendants. REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF

DOCUMENTS #1 AND #2 WITHIN THIRTY

DAYS

17 I. BACKGROUND Jeremy Jones (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12132. This case is now in the discovery phase. On April 5, 2021, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel. (ECF No. 75.) On April 28, 2021, defendants Arnette, Flores, Gonzalez, and Keener (“Defendants”) filed an opposition to the motion. (ECF No. 82.) Plaintiff’s motion to compel is now before the court. Local Rule 230(l).

26 1 The motion also contains…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.