O'Campo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 1] STEVE CRUMP, No. 2:20-cv-2343 JAM KJN P Plaintiff, Vv. ORDER A. OCAMPO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis with an action brought 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 24, 2021, plaintiff renewed his motion for preliminary 19 || injunction. However, on March 15, 2021, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations 20 addressing plaintiff's earlier motion for preliminary injunction, which was adopted by the district court on May 3, 2021, over plaintiffs objections. Plaintiff's renewed motion includes no new 22 factual allegations, and fails to address any of the elements required under Winter v. Natural 23 || Resources Defense Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7 (2008). Rather, in his one paragraph motion, 24 plaintiff simply repeats claims previously raised. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 25 plaintiff's motion (ECF…