Fisher

(HC) Lopez v. Fisher

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 3, 20211:19-cv-01486California6,305 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL LOPEZ, Case No. 1:19-cv-01486-NONE-HBK Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

GRANT RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO

v. DISMISS1 RAYTHEL FISHER, JR., (Doc. No. 10) Respondent. OBJECTIONS DUE IN TWENTY-ONE

DAYS

17 18 Petitioner Daniel Lopez (“Petitioner” or “Lopez”), a state prisoner, initiated this action by filing a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on October 17, 2019.2 (Doc. No. 1). In response, respondent filed a motion to dismiss. (Doc. No. 10). Respondent filed the state court record in support. (Doc. No. 12). Petitioner filed an opposition. (Doc. No. 15). Respondent filed a reply and further documents in support of the motion to dismiss. (Doc. Nos.

1 This matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302 (E.D. Cal. 2019). 2 The Court applies the “prison mailbox rule” to pro se prisoner petitions,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.