Browns

Williams v. Browns

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 7, 20211:21-cv-00622California2,637 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PRINCE PAUL RAYMOND WILLIAMS, Case No. 1:21-cv-00622-DAD-BAM Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

v. (Doc. 2) CHERYL L. BROWNS, et al.,

SCREENING ORDER GRANTING

Defendants. PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT

16 (Doc. 3)

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

18 19 Plaintiff Prince Paul Raymond Williams (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed this action on April 14, 2021. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint on April 16, 2021. (Doc. 3.) I. Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Concurrent with his original complaint, Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Doc. 2.) Having considered Plaintiff’s application, the Court finds Plaintiff has made the showing required by section 1915(a). Accordingly, Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). 28 II. Screening Requirement and Standard The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.