Loterzstain

(PC) Newsome v. Loterzstain

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 3, 20212:19-cv-00307California1,302 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHELDON RAY NEWSOME, Case No. 2:19-cv-00307-JAM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

v. PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION BE DENIED M. LOTERZSTAIN, et al., ECF No. 43 Defendants. OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

16 Plaintiff Sheldon Ray Newsome has filed a motion for preliminary injunction and seeks an order directing non-party prison officials at the California Medical Facility to stop their recent acts of retaliation against him for filing lawsuits. ECF No. 43 at 11. I recommend that the motion be denied because it is based on allegations unrelated to the claims in this suit. Legal Standards A federal district court may issue injunctive relief only if the court has both personal jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter jurisdiction over the lawsuit. See Murphy Bros., Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc., 526 U.S. 344, 350…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.