(PS) Stewart v. Property and Casualty Ins. Co. of Hartford

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 21, 20212:17-cv-02418California2,313 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 COLLEEN STEWART, No. 2:17-cv-02418-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER PROPERTY AND CASUALTY

INSURANCE COMPANY OF

HARTFORD, Defendant. 17 This matter is before the Court pursuant to Plaintiff Colleen Stewart’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Extension of Time for Appeal pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5). (ECF No. 89; see also ECF No. 92 (Ninth Circuit remand order).) No opposition was filed. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s Motion is GRANTED. /// /// /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff, currently proceeding in this matter pro se,1 initiated this action in the El Dorado County Superior Court on October 12, 2017. (ECF No. 1.) Defendant Property and Casualty Insurance Company of Hartford (“Defendant”) removed the action to the Eastern District of California on November 16, 2017. (Id.) On June 19, 2020, Defendant moved for summary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.