(HC) Wilson v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 20, 20212:20-cv-02217California302 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MELVIN LEE WILSON, No. 2:20-cv-2217 DB P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent. 16 In an order filed on March 22, 2021, petitioner was ordered to submit an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee. Petitioner was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty-day period to do so has expired and petitioner has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed the required documents. In accordance with the above, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and IT IS RECOMMENDED this action be dismissed without prejudice. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within thirty…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.