Winn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL CHRISTOPHER YOUNG, No. 2:20-cv-01472-TLN-DB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 14 JUDGE JOHN WINN and ROBIN LESLIE PEARL, Defendants. 17 Plaintiff Daniel Christopher Young (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding in this action pro se. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On March 24, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days after service of the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 5.) The thirty-day period has expired and Plaintiff has not filed any objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi…