(PC) Wren v. Mule Creek Prison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 19, 20211:21-cv-00806California335 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEFFREY CHARLES WREN, 1:21-cv-00806-HBK (PC)

Plaintiff, v. ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE

SACRAMENTO DIVISION OF THE

WARDEN MULE CREEK STATE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PRISON, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Before the Court is Plaintiff Charles Wren’s pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Complaint filed on May 18, 2021. (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiff alleges violations of his civil rights by defendants arising at Mule Creek State Prison, located in Amador County, and San Quentin State Prison, located in San Quentin, California. (Id. at 1). Most of the named defendants, however, reside in Amador County. (Id. at 2). Because the events giving rise to the cause of action and/or most of the defendants reside in Amador County, which is within the venue of the Sacramento Division, plaintiff should have filed the complaint in the Sacramento Division. See 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(1)-(2); see also Ziegler v. Indian River County, 64 F.3d 470, 474 (9th Cir.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.