(PC)Rojas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE A. ROJAS, No. 2:18-cv-1935 KJM AC P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RIZENDINE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. His First Amended Complaint, ECF No. 17, is before the court for screening. I. Procedural History Plaintiff’s original complaint, ECF No. 1, was screened and found unsuitable for service, ECF No. 14. The undersigned found that the complaint did not comply with Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, in that it did not provide a “short and plain statement” of the grounds for relief, and that the factual allegations (to the extent that the court could determine which allegations were intended to support which claims) did not state a claim for relief. Id. Plaintiff was granted leave to amend, and was informed of the requirements of Rule 8, the basic pleading principles…