Beshara

(PC) Walker v. Beshara

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 27, 20211:20-cv-01050California2,934 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEFFREY E. WALKER, Case No. 1:20-cv-01050-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, Initial Screening Order directing plaintiff to file an amended complaint v. (Doc. No. 1). MINA BESHARA; FNU LUU; DAVID

ROBLESS; AUDRA KING; JOSH THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

BERGER; FNU STEVEN; REBECCA KORNBLUSH, Order denying as moot (1) plaintiff’s motion for defendants to answer; and (2) motion to compel Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 8, 10)

18 19 20 Plaintiff Jeffrey E. Walker initiated this action by filing a pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint on July 30, 2020 while detained at the Coalinga State Hospital. (Doc. No. 1). The then-assigned magistrate judge granted plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on August 3, 2020. (Doc. No. 4). Also reviewed in this order are plaintiff’s “motion for defendants to answer” filed October 20, 2020, and motion to compel filed on December 9, 2020. (Docs. Nos. 8,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.