Robert Miska v. Engineering Automation & Design, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 26, 20211:20-cv-01183California672 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT MISKA, Case No. 1:20-cv-001183-AWI-BAM

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT

ENGINEERING AUTOMATION &

v. DESIGN, INC. TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR

ENGINEERING AUTOMATION & DESIGN, INC., et al., THE FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH MAY 7, 2021 ORDER AND WHY THEY SHOULD Defendants. BE ALLOWED TO PARTICIPATE IN SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS

DEADLINE: 10:45 A.M.

15 A settlement conference in this action is set for today at 11: a.m. before the undersigned. (ECF No. 22.) Pursuant to the May 7, 2021 order setting the settlement conference, the parties were required to submit a confidential settlement statement to the Court seven days prior to the conference date. (Id. at 1.) The Court has timely received the confidential statement from Plaintiff and Defendants Smith Seckman Reid, Inc. and Conagra 21 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.