White
(HC) Gelazela v. White
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 27, 20211:21-cv-00002California2,188 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARK GELAZELA, Case No. 1:21-cv-00002-HBK Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
DISMISS PETITION FOR FAILURE TO
v. STATE COGNIZABLE CLAIMS AND
FAILURE TO EXHAUST CLAIMS1
DOUGLAS WHITE,
OBJECTIONS DUE IN THIRTY DAYS
Respondent. (Doc. No. 1)
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
ASSIGN CASE TO DISTRICT JUDGE AND
PROVIDE PETITIONER BIVENS CIVIL
RIGHTS COMPLAINT FORM 19 20 Petitioner Mark Gelazela, a federal prisoner, has pending a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (Doc. No. 1). The petition is before the court for preliminary review under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Under Rule 4, the judge assigned to the habeas proceeding must examine the habeas petition and order a response to the petition unless it “plainly appears” that the petitioner is not entitled to relief. See Valdez v. 26 …