Sims

(PS) Petersen v. Sims

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 19, 20211:19-cv-00138California514 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KYLE PETERSEN, No. 1:19-cv-00138-DAD-EPG Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

ANTHONY SIMS, JR. and NICHOLAS TORRES, (Doc. No. 84) 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff Kyle Petersen is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Before the court is plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the undersigned’s January 5, 2021 order (Doc. No. 81) adopting the assigned magistrate judge’s November 24, 2020 findings and recommendations (Doc. No. 79). (Doc. No. 84.) In that order, the court stayed this action pending resolution of plaintiff’s appeal to the Ninth Circuit from the judgment of conviction entered in his criminal case. (Doc. No. 81.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.