(HC) Griffin v. People of State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 25, 20212:21-cv-00406California515 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEXTER LAWRENCE GRIFFIN, No. 2:21-cv-0406 CKD P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND BRANDON PRICE, FINDIGNS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a California civil detainee proceeding pro se with an amended petition for a 17 writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 20) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The exhaustion of state court 18 remedies is a prerequisite to the granting of a petition for writ of habeas corpus. 28 U.S.C. § 19 2254(b)(1). A petitioner satisfies the exhaustion requirement by providing the highest state court 20 with a full and fair opportunity to consider all claims before presenting them to the federal court. 21 Picard v. Connor, 404 U.S. 270, 276 (1971). In his petition, petitioner admits he has not 22 exhausted state court remedies with respect to any of his claims. Accordingly, federal habeas 23 relief is not available. 24 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court 25 assign a district court judge to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.