Constable

(PC) Cyprian v. Constable

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 26, 20212:19-cv-00689California1,161 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 REALIOUS CYPRIAN, No. 2:19-cv-0689 JAM AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER T. CONSTABLE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Before this court are two motions filed by plaintiff: one that simultaneously asks for an enlargement of time and for the consolidation of all parties served (ECF No. 37), and one that moves for a renewal of plaintiff’s request for amicus curiae (ECF No. 46). For the reasons stated below, both motions will be denied. I. ENLARGEMENT OF TIME AND CONSOLIDATION MOTION There are three defendants in this action: Correctional Officer T. Constable, Lieutenant S. Amador, and Correctional Officer J.W. Thomas. At the time the instant motion was filed in 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.