Cross

(PC) Hill v. Cross

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 26, 20212:19-cv-01430California4,000 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KENNETH HILL, No. 2:19-cv-1430 MCE AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER J. LYNCH, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law. I. Procedural History This action was originally filed in the Sacramento County Superior Court. ECF No. 1 at 6-17. After defendants removed the case, id. at 1-4, plaintiff objected on the ground that his allegations were based on violations of state law, ECF No. 5 at 1. Plaintiff was then given an opportunity to amend the complaint to remove any federal claims and file a motion for remand, ECF No. 6, which he did, ECF Nos. 8, 10. As a result, the undersigned recommended that the motion to remand be granted and that this matter be remanded to state court. ECF No. 13. Before the District Judge could rule on the findings and recommendations, plaintiff filed a second amended complaint in which he…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.